ArticleScientific reports2025
Duplex ddPCR detection of lytA and piaB in Streptococcus pneumoniae from nasopharyngeal swabs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae traditionally relies on complex and time-consuming culture methods, limiting sensitivity, especially in samples with low bacterial loads. Molecular diagnostics, particularly real-time PCR (qPCR), have significantly improved detection thresholds compared to culture. This pilot study aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting pneumococcal-specific genes lytA and piaB in nasopharyngeal swabs from asymptomatic children. A total of 165 nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected, of which ten samples were excluded during quality control, leaving 155 for analysis. These included 73 culture-positive (47%) and 82 culture-negative (53%) samples. The ddPCR analysis yielded 105 samples (68%) positive for both lytA and piaB, representing a statistically significant increase in detection compared to culture (McNemar's test, p < 1 × 10⁻⁶). An additional 12 samples exhibited single-gene positivity (lytA only: 7, piaB only: 5) but were not classified as definitive positives due to specificity concerns. Duplex ddPCR demonstrated enhanced sensitivity, particularly in samples with low pneumococcal density, and the requirement of dual-target positivity ensured high specificity. These results underline duplex ddPCR as a promising and robust diagnostic tool for pneumococcal carriage detection, with potential implications for epidemiological surveillance and clinical diagnostics. Future research directions include assay optimization, quantitative bacterial load analysis, and evaluation of the method's applicability for rapid pneumococcal detection in invasive disease contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.