ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-frame fusion enhances analytical and diagnostic efficiency in corneal confocal microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomy-guided weakly supervised learning framework for corneal nerve image denoising and enhancement.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Image stitching for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy via a motion consistency constraint.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Robust registration under large image misalignment using an iterative step-aware transformer with application to corneal confocal microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To propose a low-cost and effective image enhancement strategy based on multi-frame fusion for corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) that improves image quality without requiring additional hardware or changes to clinical workflows. The method involves aligning and integrating consecutive frames of the same region. Its performance was systematically evaluated across image alignment accuracy, noise reduction, morphological nerve feature extraction, and disease classification. Quantitative experiments showed that the proposed approach significantly enhances structural clarity and measurement reliability. Key parameters such as corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), and corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) showed substantial improvements, especially in diabetic patients. Enhanced images consistently improved both traditional metrics-based discrimination and deep learning classification models across multiple architectures, demonstrating the method's generalizability and clinical value. The proposed multi-frame fusion strategy effectively enhances CCM images with minimal additional acquisition time and without burdening patients or operators, making it highly suitable for real-world clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.