ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel nomogram and decision curve analysis for predicting head and neck skin cancer risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Kashgar, Xinjiang, China, skin cancer accounts for 51% of head and neck malignant tumors, and the incidence rate of head and neck skin cancer in this region is much higher than the national average level. This current situation highlights the necessity of risk prediction. This study retrospectively analyzed 1,156 participants from the 2015-2024 Kashgar Facial Skin Health Survey. The study employed logistic regression to screen for risk factors, and through sensitivity analysis, finally identified 8 factors that are independently associated with a high risk of skin cancer. This study developed a nomogram model for head and neck skin cancer incorporating a variety of risk factors. Key findings revealed that individuals with frequent cosmetics use, long-term high-fat diet, inadequate vegetable intake, lip-biting habit, scratching habit, smoking behavior, prolonged outdoor exposure, and those who do not wear hats have a significantly increased risk of head and neck skin cancer. The model was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (with Area Under the Curve, AUC), calibration curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The results showed that the model exhibited good reliability and accuracy in both groups, and possessed high clinical value within specific threshold ranges. In conclusion, this nomogram model can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals for head and neck skin cancer, and provide guidance for the prevention efforts of head and neck skin cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.