ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-level analysis of pregnancy termination among sexually active married women in developing countries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy termination is a global concern affecting millions of women, with less developed countries bearing a disproportionate burden. Despite progress in maternal healthcare, limited access to sexual and reproductive health services, and socio-economic disparities continue to contribute to high prevalence of pregnancy termination. This study aimed at understanding the contextual factors associated with pregnancy termination among married women in less developed countries based on the socio-ecological model.The study analysed data from 61 developing countries' Demographic and Health Surveys (2015-2022) among non-sterile, fecund women (n = 715,281). Univariate, bivariate, and binary multilevel regression analyses were conducted to examine individual, household, and community-level factors associated with pregnancy termination. Model fit was assessed using the Akaike Information Criterion, and Stata 17 was used for statistical analysis.The multilevel regression analysis revealed that pregnancy termination is significantly high (18.5%) in LDCs, and is influenced by individual, household, and community-level. Among the individual factors, older married women (AOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.83-1.80-1.87 and AOR = 2.50 95% CI: 2.54-2.56), with primary education or higher (AOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.22 - 1.17; AOR = 1.20 95% CI: 1.17-1.22 and AOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13) and in employment exhibited increased odds of termination. Partners education and higher household wealth were household factors associated with pregnancy termination. At community level, wealth index, media and family planning message exposure and contraceptive use (AOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08 and AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) were associated with termination.The study reveals that pregnancy termination among married women in LDCs are shaped by a mix of individual, household, and community factors. Women who are older, more educated, and employed are more likely to terminate a pregnancy, as are those with educated partners and from wealthier households. Additionally, increased exposure to media and family planning messaging correlates with higher termination rates. These findings underscore the need for a comprehensive policy approach to enhance women's reproductive health in LDCs. Such a strategy should include individual through to community-level interventions focused on empowering women, engaging men, improving access to family planning services, and implementing destigmatising media campaigns. These combined measures would contribute significantly to ensuring that no woman is left behind in meeting their SRH needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.