Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An AI-driven tools assessment framework for english teachers using the Fuzzy Delphi algorithm and deep learning.

Min Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Min YuDepartment of Basic Courses, Xinyang Vocational College of Art, Xinyang, 464000, Henan, China. wdeyouxiang0421@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

English literature and linguistics have long served as foundational disciplines in humanities education, cultivating critical analysis, linguistic proficiency, and cultural interpretation. Conventional teaching methods struggle to meet diverse learner needs, ensure consistent engagement, and provide personalized academic feedback. To improve learning with the help of modern techniques, this study proposes a comprehensive, multi-technique Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven tools assessment framework aimed at enhancing English pedagogy through the integration of advanced artificial intelligence tools. The research work includes adaptation of a mixed-methods research design incorporating classroom case studies, in-depth interviews, and analysis of students' documents to evaluate their learnings. The framework employed statistical techniques to validate significant relationships among engagement, tool usage, and learning clarity. Key evaluation criteria is captured using the Fuzzy Delphi Technique which identifies high-importance attributes such as AI usage, usability, and analytical quality. Moreover, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques including LIME and SHAP applied to enhance model transparency, offering both global and local interpretability of outcomes. To predict pedagogical effectiveness, a deep learning Bi-LSTM model was trained, achieving 90% accuracy, 92% precision, 93% recall, and 92% F1-score across key performance metrics for the usage analysis of AI-based tools.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigital humanitiesEducation technologyEnglish linguisticsLiterary pedagogy

Identifiers

PMID41286088
PMCPMC12644666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.