Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trend Factor Smoothing and Tasmanian Devil Optimization based Siamese Neural Network for anomaly detection in predictive maintenance.

Ida Hector, Rukmani Panjanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ida Hector *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India.
Rukmani PanjanathanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India. rukmani.p@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In today's business world, predictive maintenance is essential since it helps organizations prevent equipment breakdowns and minimize downtime. A novel technique that employs machine learning to anticipate equipment failures is anomaly detection-based predictive maintenance. This method helps maintenance teams to foresee and prevent problems by looking for patterns and anomalies in historical data. This lowers the possibility of unplanned downtime and boosts overall productivity. Using optimized deep learning, this study is intended to create an advanced deep learning model for anomaly detection in the predictive maintenance of cyber-physical systems, incorporating trend factor smoothing with Tasmanian devil optimization (TFsTDO) and siamese neural networks (SNN) to enhance detection precision and operational efficacy. The proposed TFsTDO-SNN system encompasses preprocessing through Box-Cox transformation, feature selection utilizing an innovative TFsTDO algorithm, anomaly injection via oversampling, and anomaly detection employing an SNN trained by TFsTDO. The model was assessed utilizing the CNC Mill Tool Wear dataset, with performance criteria comprising precision, recall, and F1-score. Experimental findings indicate that TFsTDO-SNN attains a precision of 96.5%, a recall of 97.2%, and an F1-score of 96.9%, surpassing traditional approaches including GA, AdaBoost, LSTM-autoencoder, and CNN-LSTM. The TFsTDO-SNN model provides a strong solution for anomaly identification in predictive maintenance, with prospects for future improvements using explainable AI and sophisticated optimization methods.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningMarsupialiaAnomaly detectionCyber physical systemsDeep learningOptimizationPredictive maintenance

Identifiers

PMID41286087
PMCPMC12644727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.