ArticleScientific reports2025
Behaviour of ewes and lambs in response to human emotional odours.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated whether sheep (Ovis aries) discriminate the body odour of unfamiliar humans subjected to a contrastive emotion-inducing procedure. Axillary secretions were collected from 38 humans after they watched fearful or joyful films. The behavioural responses of adult ewes (n = 35) and 6-day-old lambs (n = 22) to these odours were assessed using a habituation-dishabituation paradigm validated in this species. Both ewes and lambs exhibited habituation (reduced tactile-olfactory investigation), but no significant dishabituation, limiting strong conclusions about odour discrimination. However, ewes displayed ear postures suggestive of differential emotional reactivity to assumed valence, but these effects were subtle and potentially influenced by test conditions. The lambs exposed to fear odour (FO), relative to those exposed to joy odour (JO), showed increased escape attempts and oral grasping of the odour pad, a conflicting pattern of responses that complicates interpreting FO as aversive. In sum, these results suggest that lambs may react to FO as a distinct stimulus, but they may not clearly associate it with negative valence. Ewes showed behavioural differences in response to odours, yet the absence of clear dishabituation makes it difficult to confirm discrimination ability. Further research including physiological measures is needed to clarify ovine perception of human emotional odours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.