Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286059›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Breath-based lung cancer detection using an ML-driven low-cost sensor array.

Dhruv Iyer, Kavin Gobinath, Krish Kowkuntla, Vitthalrao Vijaykumar Wanjari, Gokulakrishna Banumurthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhruv Iyer *Mountain View High School, Mountain View, 94040, US.
Kavin Gobinath *Irvington High School, Fremont, 94538, US.
Krish Kowkuntla *Irvington High School, Fremont, 94538, US.
Vitthalrao Vijaykumar WanjariMaharashtra Medical Council, Nagpur, India. vitthalrao.wanjari@gmail.com.
Gokulakrishna BanumurthyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, 35294, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lately, electronic nose (e-nose) systems have emerged as a promising method for non-invasive lung cancer detection. These systems, however, have several limitations, including low accuracy rates and long detection times. To address these challenges, we conducted a pilot study involving the development of an affordable e-nose device that can detect more than 30 volatile organic compounds, using twelve metal oxide semiconductor sensors and one chemi-resistive alkane sensor. The device recorded data for 28 healthy controls and 18 lung cancer breath samples that were then analyzed using a multilayer perceptron neural network. The dataset was expanded through a novel use of data augmentation, where Gaussian noise was applied to generate synthetic samples while preserving the original data's statistical properties. The model was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and achieved an accuracy of 96.26%, sensitivity of 92.88%, specificity of 97.75%, and an area under the curve of 0.9286. Our system outperforms existing e-nose detection methods by more than 5% and is capable of classifying in approximately 5 minutes. These findings highlight the potential of this breath analyzer system as a rapid and cost-effective tool for preliminary lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseLung NeoplasmsAgedBreath TestsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPilot ProjectsSensitivity and SpecificityVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID41286059
PMCPMC12644706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.