ArticleScientific reports2025
Breath-based lung cancer detection using an ML-driven low-cost sensor array.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular point-of-care: technological evolution, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lately, electronic nose (e-nose) systems have emerged as a promising method for non-invasive lung cancer detection. These systems, however, have several limitations, including low accuracy rates and long detection times. To address these challenges, we conducted a pilot study involving the development of an affordable e-nose device that can detect more than 30 volatile organic compounds, using twelve metal oxide semiconductor sensors and one chemi-resistive alkane sensor. The device recorded data for 28 healthy controls and 18 lung cancer breath samples that were then analyzed using a multilayer perceptron neural network. The dataset was expanded through a novel use of data augmentation, where Gaussian noise was applied to generate synthetic samples while preserving the original data's statistical properties. The model was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and achieved an accuracy of 96.26%, sensitivity of 92.88%, specificity of 97.75%, and an area under the curve of 0.9286. Our system outperforms existing e-nose detection methods by more than 5% and is capable of classifying in approximately 5 minutes. These findings highlight the potential of this breath analyzer system as a rapid and cost-effective tool for preliminary lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.