ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoding brain age predictions from sleep electroencephalography across infancy to adolescence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood sleep electroencephalography (EEG) reveals brain maturation patterns aligned with age, offering a window into development at the bedside. Leveraging this, we used supervised neural networks to predict age from overnight EEG and derive a Functional Brain Age (FBA) across wake, NREM (N1-N3), and REM sleep in 814 children with clinically normal sleep studies. We evaluated how FBA varies across sleep architecture and assessed the accuracy of neural networks, EEG channels, sleep segments, data quality, quantitative EEG features, and explainability methods on prediction performance. Prediction accuracy varied developmentally, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.78 years in infancy (0-2 years), 0.87 years in childhood (2-12 years), and 1.55 years in adolescence (12-18 years), yielding an overall MAE of 0.96 years (95CI 0.90-1.01). FBA fell within ± 25% of chronological age in over 95% of children, with highest accuracy (< 1 year MAE) during N2, N3, and REM stages that reflect well-defined developmental EEG changes such as delta power and spindles. FBA reliability was shaped by signal quality and stable, age-specific patterns across sleep stages. Explainability analyses showed that network activations aligned with quantitative EEG features, supporting the biological validity of FBA. These findings support scalable, non-invasive tools that use sleep EEG to track brain maturation as an objective marker of neurodevelopmental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.