ArticleScientific reports2025
Three dimensional morphometric analysis of cervical uncinate process from C3 to C7 with surgical implications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The uncinate process is a key anatomical structure in the cervical spine, essential for uncovertebral joint formation and spinal biomechanics. Although its linear dimensions have been previously described, the relationship between its vertical height and angular orientation remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the three-dimensional morphometry of the uncinate process from C3 to C7, focusing on correlations between height and angular parameters. Fifty-one dry human cervical vertebrae (C3-C7), obtained from multiple adult donors (donor count unknown; sex unknown), were analyzed using high-resolution CT (0.75-mm slices). Although specimens were unevenly distributed across vertebral levels, measurements included uncinate height, uncinate angle, and endplate angle on coronal reconstructions. Statistical analysis involved Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman's correlation tests. No significant side-to-side differences were found in uncinate height or angle, though the endplate angle was significantly higher on the left. Inter-level comparisons revealed significant differences in left uncinate height and bilateral endplate angles. Importantly, uncinate height showed a strong negative correlation with uncinate angle (Right: ρ = - 0.557; Left: ρ = - 0.677; both p < 0.001) and a strong positive correlation with endplate angle (Right: ρ = 0.777; Left: ρ = 0.809; both p < 0.001). These findings underscore the anatomical variability and interdependence of vertical and angular features of the uncinate process, with implications for uncovertebral joint mechanics and surgical approach planning. Recognizing such variations may improve safety and accuracy in anterior cervical spine procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.