ArticleScientific reports2025
Sex difference in the neural correlates of volitional eyes closing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volitional eyes closing (EC), which shifts brain's information processing modes from the "exteroceptive" to "interoceptive" state, can promote behaviors (such as episodic memory) that exhibit significant sex difference. Although this act is known to reconfigure a large-scale brain network as its neural correlates, sex difference in such network reconfiguration remains unexplored. Here, we compared between genders the EC-effects on functional network, focusing on the intersubject variability in functional connectivity (IVFC), modularity index, local efficiency, and clustering coefficient. While reliable EC-effects were observed in both genders, females demonstrated greater alterations in IVFC and modularity index than males. Moreover, the female-biased effects of EC were supported by a large-scale cortical basis, primarily affecting the default-mode and visual networks. Finally, a positive relationship was discovered between the sex difference of EC-effects and that of brain anatomy. Jointly, our findings suggested that biological sex serves as a potential factor influencing EC's neural correlates, with widespread impacts on cognitive systems and close link to brain anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.