ArticleScientific reports2025
Probabilistic assessment of human instability in urban areas exposed to flood events.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Floods in an urban environment are often associated with casualties among pedestrians who move to reach a safe area, due to body stability issues. Pedestrian instability is a random event that depends on the interaction between individual movement and floodwater. Randomness is however often overlooked by current methods, which assess instability risk by deterministic models and provide simplified thresholds that decision-makers then use in emergency planning. Here, instability risk is estimated by a logistic regression model where the toppling probability is a function of water depth and flow speed. The proposal depends on parameters that can be rigorously estimated by experimental data using standard statistical methods. It can be straightforwardly extended to allow for multiple instability mechanisms and subject-specific biometrical information. It includes previous proposals as particular cases, providing a general framework where different thresholds can be compared. It therefore provides a novel rigorous probabilistic integration of instability mechanisms into a unified logistic regression framework, calibrated with experimental data, and applied at urban scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.