ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on the mechanical characteristics of a natural Fiber-based hybrid polymer composite.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Hybrid Polymeric Woven Composites: Mechanical Performance, Numerical Simulation, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigation on the mechanical behavior of coconut leaf sheath and midrib of coconut leaf reinforced epoxy composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi criteria optimization of FDM process parameters for NylonAF80 filaments using CRITIC CoCoSo and machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chemical and structural characterization of ramie-based epoxy composites reinforced with macadamia nut shell biochar.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, the hybrid fiber-based epoxy composite samples have been prepared with the application of three unlike organic natural fibers viz., Sisal (S), Ramie (R), and Flax (F) and epoxy as the matrix, with a weight ratio of 70:30 for epoxy and fibers. Six different stacking sequences of fibers, pure fibers and pure matrix were used for specimen preparation, namely S/F/F/F/S, F/S/S/S/F, F/R/R/R/F, R/F/F/F/R, R/S/S/S/R, S/R/R/R/S, PS, PR, PF, and Pure matrix. The composite specimen was prepared by manually and uniform thickness was obtained by the compression moulding process. The mechanical trials such as, tensile, impact, hardness, and flexural tests had been carried out on the composite samples. The results revealed that among all the fiber-stacking combinations, the maximum tensile strength was observed in the Sisal and Flax fiber-based sequence F/S/S/S/F, showing a 366.7% enhancement compared to pure epoxy. The composite materials with the layering sequences R/S/S/S/R, F/R/R/R/F, and R/F/F/F/R demonstrate superior flexural strength, impact strength, and hardness values, respectively, compared to other combinations of composites. The maximum tensile, flexural, and impact strengths and hardness of F/S/S/S/F, R/S/S/S/R, F/R/R/R/F and R/F/F/F/R are 36.28 MPa, 77.8 MPa, 13.38 kJ/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.