ArticleScientific reports2025
Long distance migration assisted structural trapping during CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-distance migration-assisted structural trapping represents an optimal configuration for offshore geological CO₂ storage. In this study, the trapping efficiency of CO₂ was quantitatively analyzed using CMG software, taking into account aqueous solubility and geochemical reactions. The investigation focused on CO₂ migration behavior, mineralogical changes, pH and porosity variations induced by geochemical processes, and their respective contributions to overall carbon storage. Simulation results show that CO₂ tends to accumulate near the injection wells and subsequently migrates upward along the slightly dipping strata due to density differences between CO₂ and formation brine. After the injection wells are shut in, the CO₂ plume continues to migrate up-dip toward the crest of the anticline structure. A substantial portion of CO₂ remains trapped in the dipping strata due to capillary pressure hysteresis. As CO₂ dissolves into the saline aquifer, it generates H⁺ ions, which promote the dissolution of anorthite, releasing Ca²⁺ and Al³⁺ necessary for the precipitation of calcite and kaolinite over time. Results indicate that kaolinite and calcite predominantly precipitate within the aqueous phase, while anorthite is continuously dissolved throughout the simulation. The interplay of mineral dissolution and precipitation dynamically alters both pH and porosity. Anorthite is not the sole source of Ca²⁺; minerals such as dolomite and limestone can also readily contribute to Ca²⁺ availability, depending on the rock’s mineral composition. A localized pH decrease is observed along the CO₂ migration pathway. Porosity slightly decreases in the near-well zone but increases in the structurally elevated areas. The proportion of structurally trapped CO₂ increases during the injection phase but decreases during the subsequent long-distance migration phase. Residual gas trapping exhibits an initial rise followed by a decline, driven by capillary pressure hysteresis. Overall, the mechanism of long-distance migration-assisted structural trapping significantly enhances the long-term security and effectiveness of CO₂ geological storage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.