Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285971›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

AI-based forecasting of groundwater corrosion and scaling indices in semi-arid regions using 25-year data analysis.

Ali Gorjizade, Abbas Parsaie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali GorjizadeDepartment of Hydrology and Water Resources, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abbas ParsaieDepartment of Hydrology and Water Resources, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. abbas_parsaie@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing water corrosivity indices is vital for sustainable management, since it damages infrastructure, increase costs, and threaten public health. In this study, the corrosive and scaling behavior of groundwater was modeled and predicted using, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), and Random Forest (RF). Three indices were employed: the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), the Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), and the Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI). The models were developed using 25 years of daily groundwater data from the Dezful-Andimeshk plain in southwestern Iran. In the study area, LSI values ranged from - 8.91 to 0.27, RSI from 8.46 to 18.72, and PSI from - 5.83 to 3.62, indicating that groundwater exhibits both corrosive and scaling tendencies depending on location. SAR (Sodium Adsorption Ratio), pH, and TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) were used as input variables for model development. Among the tested algorithms. The SVM model, performance metrics during the testing phase were as follows: LSI (R² = 0.92, RMSE = 0.11), RSI (R² = 0.81, RMSE = 0.21), and PSI (R² = 0.82, RMSE = 0.21). Overall, model comparisons indicated that all four algorithms achieved acceptable accuracy (R² = 0.80-0.93). However, MARS and ANN consistently provided superior and more stable performance, effectively capturing nonlinear and interactive relationships among the predictors. RF produced competitive results but did not show clear dominance over the other models in this dataset.

Indexed as

Hydrochemical parametersLangelier saturation index (LSI)MARS modelPuckorius scaling index (PSI)Random forest (RF)Ryznar stability index (RSI)

Identifiers

PMID41285971
PMCPMC12644597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.