ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent construction method for rock slope fracture network model based on discrete element and neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the engineering challenge of accurately characterizing complex internal fracture networks in high-steep rock slopes, this study proposes an intelligent Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) construction method integrating field adit data and intelligent algorithms. Taking the Dadu River Chengdu Bank rock slope as a case study, spatial distribution characteristics of adit fractures were obtained through engineering geological surveys. A 3D DFN generation model framework was established using Monte Carlo stochastic principles. Multiple numerical simulation experiments were designed using 3DEC software to generate a data sample library encompassing geometric parameters such as fracture orientation, trace length, and spatial position. A mapping relationship between adit fracture characteristic parameters and DFN model parameters was constructed using Back Propagation (BP) and Cascade Correlation (CC) neural networks. Through model structure optimization and hyperparameter training, optimal prediction models were obtained. Results indicate that the exploration adit fracture image format features a resolution of 600 × 9000 pixels, green color, and 70% transparency for fracture traces. Under a stratified modeling strategy, prediction errors for different lithological units were 18.4% for the four-layer BP network in diorite regions, 8.0% for the three-layer BP network in cataclastic rock regions, and 10.3% for the CC network in granite regions, validating the applicability of the intelligent algorithms. This method achieves high-precision inversion of fracture networks using limited adit data, providing a novel approach for modeling complex rock mass structures. The findings have been applied to the Dadu River Grand Bridge slope engineering project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.