Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimal material selection of biocomposites for structural applications: an integrated fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS approach.

Ashish Soni, Sonu Kumar Gupta, Sethupathi Bose, Jitendra Kumar Katiyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashish SoniCentre for Additive Manufacturing, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600069, India.
Sonu Kumar GuptaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Sandip University, Nashik, MH, 422212, India.
Sethupathi BoseCentre for Additive Manufacturing, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600069, India.
Jitendra Kumar KatiyarDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. jitendra.katiyar@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The material selection is a decisive factor in the development and workability of composites. The research proposed an integrated fuzzy CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) for material selection of 3D printed biocomposites developed by using fruit waste-derived biofillers and biodegradable polymers. The objective was to develop a mathematical model for materials selection of biocomposites for structural applications such as floor tiles, pavements, building blocks, doors, etc. Also, the composites can be effectively implemented in places where the consideration for mechanical and tribological performance under ambient conditions such as sliding elements, automobiles bumpers and interiors, frames, etc. are of prime importance The novelty of the work can be highlighted from the development of novel biocomposites and mathematical model which can effectively deals with the material selection problems in conditions of vagueness and hesitancy in the decision makers. The work will save time and resources and reduce the cost of biocomposites. The work brings sustainability to the composites manufacturing industries. CThe RITIC approach has revealed that the impact strength is the most significant criterion, whereas sliding wear is the least significant factor for the composites. The approach has identified the reinforcement of 20 wt.% of banana peel powder with 80 wt.% of polylactic acid, i.e. alternative A4, as the most suitable material for structural applications, whereas alternative A6 is composed of 90 wt.% of PLA and 10 wt.% of hybrid biofillers of banana peel powder and orange peel powder (in equal proportions), is the least preferable alternative. The identified best composite has demonstrated an impact strength of 20,000 kJ/m

Indexed as

BiocompositesCharacterizationsHybrid biofillersMaterial selectionMathematical model

Identifiers

PMID41285949
PMCPMC12644574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.