ArticleScientific reports2025
Linking gut microbiota rhythmicity to circadian maturation in infants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stool Dynamics and the Developing Gut Microbiome During Infancy.Journal of biological rhythms · 2026Article
- Fecal melatonin as a biomarker of emerging circadian maturity and gut microbiota in infancy.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2026Article
- Interconnected Developmental Trajectories of the Brain, Gut, and Sleep in Early Life: The First 1000 Days of Nutritional Opportunity.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Psychological stress and gut microbiota regulation of osteoarthritis progression: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Barrier-Immune Gating Failure in Gut-Brain Neuroinflammation: A Working Hypothesis and Conceptual Framework.Behavioural neurology · 2026Review
- The gut microbiota and sleep in infants: a focus on diurnal rhythmicity patterns.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human gut microbiota undergoes daily fluctuations, yet its interaction with sleep-wake patterns during infancy remains largely uncharted. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between gut microbiota rhythmicity and the development of sleep patterns in infants over the first year of life. We continuously monitored 162 healthy infants across multiple days at 3, 6, and 12 months of age using ankle actigraphy and 24-hour diaries. The Circadian Function Index (CFI) was computed as a proxy for sleep-wake rhythm maturation. Stool samples were collected to profile gut microbiota taxa composition via 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and microbial oscillations were assessed through sine and cosine fitting to detect 24-hour patterns. Our findings revealed that the relative abundance of bacterial taxa exhibited rhythmic patterns, with 26 zOTUs (1.74%) following a sine pattern and 100 zOTUs (6.69%) displaying cosine rhythmicity. Cosine rhythmicity became more pronounced with age, showing strong maturation: 7 zOTUs at 3 months, 2 zOTUs at 6 months, and 86 zOTUs at 12 months. Notably, 105 zOTUs (7.02%) were associated with CFI, demonstrating a significant relationship between gut microbiota rhythms and sleep development. Among these, 27 zOTUs with sine dynamics and 96 zOTUs with cosine dynamics were linked to CFI, with this association strengthening as infants aged. These results highlight the increasing synchronization between gut microbiota rhythmicity and sleep-wake cycles during infancy, pointing to a critical window for potential health interventions. This novel observation, previously reported in rodents and adults, underscores the role of gut microbiota in early human development, offering new avenues for enhancing developmental outcomes through targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.