Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285939›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Keyphrase extraction by the use of glove and ResNeXt optimized by enhanced human evolutionary optimization (EHEO) algorithm.

Chao Pan, Yanshu Liu, Mohammad Sarabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao PanHunan Mass Media Vocational and Technical College, Changsha, 410100, Hunan, China.
Yanshu LiuHunan Mass Media Vocational and Technical College, Changsha, 410100, Hunan, China. L76ysh@163.com.
Mohammad SarabiSharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. sarabimohammad1990@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keyphrase extraction (KPE) is an essential process in natural language processing, facilitating the document content summarization for diverse uses like search engine optimization and information retrieval. Nevertheless, manual extraction can be labor-intensive, and automated techniques often face challenges in understanding contextual relationships within the text. This research introduces an innovative method that employs the ResNeXt neural network architecture, optimized by an enhanced human evolutionary optimization algorithm, and integrated with GloVe-100 word embeddings. The model was evaluated utilizing the KP20k dataset, a commonly utilized resource that includes approximately 500,000 scientific papers labeled with keyphrases, the Inspec database that comprises 2,000 English abstracts, and the SemEval-2010 benchmark dataset that comprises 244 research papers. The proposed model was evaluated against other advanced approaches, such as Convolutional Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, BERT, Convolutional Neural Network-BERT, and Gated Recurrent Unit, and outperformed them with recall, precision, and F1-score values of 98.81%, 98.67%, and 98.74%, respectively. It could achieve 96.54%, 96.32%, and 96.43% in precision, recall, and F1-score on the Inspect dataset, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model indicated remarkable performance over the SemEval-2010 dataset by achieving 97.32% precision, 97.81% recall, and an F1-score of 97.56%. These findings highlighted the efficacy of integrating high-quality embeddings and optimization strategies with advanced neural architectures. The suggested model provided a strong and effective solution for automatic extraction, which can be potentially used in various fields.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsData MiningNatural Language ProcessingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineEnhanced human evolutionary optimization algorithmGlove-100Keyphrase extractionNatural language processingResNeXt

Identifiers

PMID41285939
PMCPMC12644682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.