ArticleScientific reports2025
Keyphrase extraction by the use of glove and ResNeXt optimized by enhanced human evolutionary optimization (EHEO) algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keyphrase extraction (KPE) is an essential process in natural language processing, facilitating the document content summarization for diverse uses like search engine optimization and information retrieval. Nevertheless, manual extraction can be labor-intensive, and automated techniques often face challenges in understanding contextual relationships within the text. This research introduces an innovative method that employs the ResNeXt neural network architecture, optimized by an enhanced human evolutionary optimization algorithm, and integrated with GloVe-100 word embeddings. The model was evaluated utilizing the KP20k dataset, a commonly utilized resource that includes approximately 500,000 scientific papers labeled with keyphrases, the Inspec database that comprises 2,000 English abstracts, and the SemEval-2010 benchmark dataset that comprises 244 research papers. The proposed model was evaluated against other advanced approaches, such as Convolutional Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, BERT, Convolutional Neural Network-BERT, and Gated Recurrent Unit, and outperformed them with recall, precision, and F1-score values of 98.81%, 98.67%, and 98.74%, respectively. It could achieve 96.54%, 96.32%, and 96.43% in precision, recall, and F1-score on the Inspect dataset, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model indicated remarkable performance over the SemEval-2010 dataset by achieving 97.32% precision, 97.81% recall, and an F1-score of 97.56%. These findings highlighted the efficacy of integrating high-quality embeddings and optimization strategies with advanced neural architectures. The suggested model provided a strong and effective solution for automatic extraction, which can be potentially used in various fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.