ArticleScientific reports2025
Pore plate sensilla scale and distribution modulate odor capture around honey bee antennae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antennal Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Gustatory Receptors Associated with Pollen Foraging Preferences inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Active sensing: different plume structures affect movements of antennae in honey bees (Apis mellifera).The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insects increase fitness by extracting chemical odor information from the environment using chemoreceptors on antennae that exhibit diverse morphology across species. Honey bees have rod-like antennae with three segments. The most distal segment is the flagellum, which includes pore plates with olfactory receptor neuron dendrites that contain odor receptors. Many studies have examined flow and odor dynamics around antennal structures with simplified sensillae; however, no extant studies resolve pore plate scale fluid processes along the antennal surface. Here, we numerically modeled honey bee antennae in odorized flow fields to evaluate effects of pore plate scale and distribution on fluid drag forces and odor capture rates. For a range of wind speeds and pore plate sizes, we find that boundary layer development enhances odor fluxes preferentially to leading edge pore plate sensilla. This could explain observations of increased pore plate densities along the leading edge of honey bee antennae. Furthermore, we find an asymptotic limit on odor capture rates for a fixed antennal size for dense pore plate sensilla; these pore plates ultimately compete for a finite supply of odor. Larger antennae capture more odor but do so at an energetic cost due to increased drag forces. Our findings can guide both bio-inspired design principles of robotic olfaction and experimental efforts aimed at studying insect odor perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.