Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of toothbrushing on aesthetic and mechanical properties of hydrophilic antibacterial coating materials for orthodontic clear retainers.

Young-Eun Oh, Hyung-Seog Yu, Sung-Hwan Choi, Tae-Hyun Choi, Jae-Sung Kwon, Jung-Yul Cha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young-Eun OhDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Seog YuDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hwan ChoiDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hyun ChoiDepartment of Orthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Sung KwonDepartment and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Yul ChaDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. jungcha@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the aesthetic, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of clear retainer materials with an antibacterial coating. Specifically, it evaluates whether the coating can retain its effectiveness after repeated toothbrushing by assessing material integrity, surface roughness, and bacterial adhesion in vitro. Four types of 1.0-mm thermoplastic sheets widely used in orthodontic clear retainers were tested: PUL (Magicfoil R, Osstem, Korea), PUC (Magicfoil R with a hydrophilic antibacterial coating), PUZ (Zendura, Bay Materials, USA), and PET (CA Retention Foil, Scheu-Dental, Germany). The PUL, PUC, and PUZ sheets were composed of polyurethane (PU), whereas the PET sheets were made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). Flexural strength, tensile strength, and cyclic load tests were conducted to compare the mechanical properties of these four materials, and transparency was compared to evaluate aesthetic properties. The surface roughness of the specimens and the antibacterial ability against Streptococcus mutans were measured before and after toothbrushing. The antibacterial coating did not change the mechanical or aesthetic properties of the retainer material. After brushing, all types' materials had similar surface roughness values as before brushing. Additionally, the antibacterial coating group (PUC) exhibited lower bacterial adhesion than the uncoated group (PUL), with reductions of 36% before and 40% after toothbrushing. The difference was statistically significant before toothbrushing (p < 0.05), but not after simulated toothbrushing. These results confirm that the hydrophilic coating has an antibacterial effect and that this effect can be maintained even after repeated toothbrushing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleToothbrushingBacterial AdhesionEsthetics, DentalHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMaterials TestingPolyurethanesStreptococcus mutansSurface PropertiesTensile StrengthAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePolyurethanesAntibacterial effectHydrophilic coatingOrthodontic clear retainerPhysical propertiesSurface roughnessTransparency

Identifiers

PMID41285891
PMCPMC12644521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.