ArticleNature communications2025
Comparative transcriptome atlas as an assistive modality for complex classification of rare kidney cancers.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From fusion partner to clinical practice: A treatment-oriented framework for transcription factor E3 (Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Review
- Comparative genomic analysis of hypervirulent and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from respiratory samples: A computational assessment of virulence genes.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a great unmet medical need for development of molecularly characterizing modalities to assist in the complex classification of rare kidney cancers, some of which are diagnosed as unclassified renal cell carcinoma (unclassified RCC) due to complex histology. Here we show utility of the comparative transcriptome atlas as an assistive modality for complex classification of rare kidney cancers. Whereas whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 52 rare kidney cancers identifies very few clinically significant variants in a subset of cases, unsupervised clustering results of RNA-seq data from 219 renal tumors including 140 rare kidney cancers are largely consistent with the histological classification based on WHO2022 classification. Additionally, the comparative transcriptome atlas may provide an opportunity to define the molecular characteristics of unclassified RCC and might predict patient outcome. These findings support the comparative transcriptome atlas as an assistive modality for complex classification of rare kidney cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.