ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical impact of an emergency fast-track pathway on early intervention and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of the Buteyko breathing technique on sleep quality, fatigue, and oxygen saturation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Trial
- Epidemiological Characteristics of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients at Ogulin General Hospital over a Ten-Year Period.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Emergency procedural pathway combined with graded zoning management is associated with improved in-hospital survival and quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and clinical outcomes are highly dependent on rapid diagnosis and treatment. Although guidelines emphasize time-sensitive targets, delays remain common in real-world emergency care. Evidence on the effectiveness of structured fast-track pathways, particularly in Asian populations and across the full ACS spectrum, is limited. To evaluate the impact of an emergency fast-track pathway on process-of-care metrics and short-term clinical outcomes in ACS patients. We conducted a prospective cohort study including 870 consecutive patients with ACS (STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina) presenting to the emergency department from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients managed via the fast-track pathway (n = 438) were compared with those receiving conventional care (n = 432). The primary endpoints were door-to-electrocardiogram (ECG) time, door-to-balloon (D2B) time, and time to first antiplatelet therapy. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 30-day outcomes. Confounding was minimized using propensity score–based inverse probability of treatment weighting. The fast-track pathway significantly reduced door-to-ECG time (median 8 vs. 18 min, p < 0.001), D2B time in STEMI (68 vs. 102 min, p < 0.001), and time to first antiplatelet therapy (14 vs. 28 min, p < 0.001). Patients in the fast-track group had a lower incidence of in-hospital MACE (6.6% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.011), fewer recurrent myocardial infarctions (2.5% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.046), and shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001). At 30 days, the composite endpoint of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization was reduced (8.7% vs. 13.9%; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.90; p = 0.011). Major bleeding rates were similar between groups. Emergency fast-track pathways significantly improve treatment timeliness and clinical outcomes in ACS without increasing bleeding risk. These findings provide real-world evidence supporting the broader integration of fast-track protocols into emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.