Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285803›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Efficient event-based delay learning in spiking neural networks.

Balázs Mészáros, James C Knight, Thomas Nowotny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuromorphic Devices and Computing for Sensing, Memory, and Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Balázs MészárosSussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. b.mszros@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-4523
James C KnightSussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-0074
Thomas NowotnySussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. t.nowotny@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4451-915X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking Neural Networks compute using sparse communication and are attracting increased attention as a more energy-efficient alternative to traditional Artificial Neural Networks. While standard Artificial Neural Networks are stateless, spiking neurons are stateful and hence intrinsically recurrent, making them well-suited for spatio-temporal tasks. However, the duration of this intrinsic memory is limited by synaptic and membrane time constants. Delays are a powerful additional mechanism and, in this paper, we propose an event-based training method for Spiking Neural Networks with delays, grounded in the EventProp formalism, which enables the calculation of exact gradients with respect to weights and delays. Our method supports multiple spikes per neuron and introduces a delay learning algorithm that can, in contrast to previous methods, also be applied to recurrent Spiking Neural Networks. We evaluate our method on a simple sequence detection task, as well as the Yin-Yang, Spiking Heidelberg Digits, Spiking Speech Commands and Braille letter reading datasets, demonstrating that our algorithm can optimise delays from suboptimal initial conditions and enhance classification accuracy compared to architectures without delays. We also find that recurrent delays are particularly beneficial in small networks. Finally, we show that our approach uses less than half the memory of the current state-of-the-art delay-learning method and is up to 26 × faster.

Identifiers

PMID41285803
PMCPMC12644660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.