Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285783›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Effects of eye closure on the spiking activity of human lateral geniculate neurons.

Matthew W Self, Osvaldo Vilela-Filho, Sergio Neuenschwander, Hélio F Silva-Filho, Lissa C Goulart, Pieter R Roelfsema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew W Self *Department of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-579X
Osvaldo Vilela-Filho *Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. ovilelafilho@clanfer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-1580
Sergio NeuenschwanderBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7493-121X
Hélio F Silva-FilhoDepartments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-5091
Lissa C GoulartDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Pieter R RoelfsemaDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.roelfsema@nin.knaw.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-0034

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101052963EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101138075EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 899287Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 17619ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 09120232310021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus is a key link between the retina and visual cortex but our understanding of the properties of neurons in the human LGN is based on recordings in animal models. Here we recorded spiking activity of cells in the LGN of two patients who had electrodes implanted in the LGN as part of their treatment for epilepsy. Human LGN cells responded to strong visual stimulation with high-frequency bursts of spikes. The cells had receptive-field properties resembling those of monkeys with circular ON-OFF sub-fields, red-green opponency in the dorsal layers and preferences for high temporal frequencies in the ventral layers. Responses were largely monocular and the closure of one eye decreased the spontaneous activity of broad-spiking neurons preferring this eye while increasing the activity of neurons with narrower spikes, suggesting that interneurons might gate LGN activity during eye closure.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsGeniculate BodiesNeuronsAdultAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedEpilepsyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID41285783
PMCPMC12645034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.