Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285777›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Systemic impacts of disruptions at maritime chokepoints.

Jasper Verschuur, Johannes Lumma, Jim W Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasper VerschuurOxford Programme for Sustainable Infrastructure Systems (OPSIS), Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jasper.verschuur@eci.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5277-4353
Johannes LummaOxford Programme for Sustainable Infrastructure Systems (OPSIS), Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jim W HallOxford Programme for Sustainable Infrastructure Systems (OPSIS), Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-9191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global trade relies on a small number of strategic passageways, so-called maritime chokepoints, which are vulnerable to disruptions. Yet, the exposure of countries to these disruptions has not been comprehensively assessed, inhibiting adequate preparedness. Here, we quantify the systemic impacts of maritime chokepoint disruptions subject to a variety of hazards, both natural and human-induced. The expected value of trade disrupted at chokepoints is estimated to be USD192 billion annually, mainly attributed to geopolitical risk at the Taiwan Strait and Suez Canal, and a combination of hazards affecting the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. We estimate the economic losses of chokepoint disruptions, due to delays, rerouting, insurance premiums and trade disruptions, to be USD10.7 billion per year, and an additional USD3.4 billion per year due to increased freight costs. In both cases, risks to the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb Strait drive these losses. Countries most affected are in the vicinity of these two chokepoints, but also further away, including countries in Western Africa and Central Asia. At a time of heightened geopolitical tensions and climate change, our results help to quantify the implications of these risks and can present a useful starting point to identify resilience interventions to mitigate these threats.

Identifiers

PMID41285777
PMCPMC12644514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.