Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285763›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Post-learning replay of hippocampal-striatal activity is biased by reward-prediction signals.

Emma L Roscow, Timothy Howe, Nathan F Lepora, Matthew W Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma L RoscowSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. emma.roscow.research@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-1350
Timothy HoweSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nathan F Lepora *School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5327-1523
Matthew W Jones *School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5396-3108

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 109070/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 202810/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity encoding recent experiences is replayed during sleep and rest to promote consolidation of memories. However, precisely which features of experience influence replay prioritisation to optimise adaptive behaviour remains unclear. Here, we trained adult male rats on a novel maze-based reinforcement learning task designed to dissociate reward outcomes from reward-prediction errors. Four variations of a reinforcement learning model were fitted to the rats' behaviour over multiple days. Behaviour was best predicted by a model incorporating replay biased by reward-prediction error, compared to the same model with no replay, random replay or reward-biased replay. Neural population recordings from the hippocampus and ventral striatum of rats trained on the task evidenced preferential reactivation of reward-prediction and reward-prediction error signals during post-task rest. These insights disentangle the influences of salience on replay, suggesting that reinforcement learning is tuned by post-learning replay biased by reward-prediction error, not by reward per se. This work therefore provides a behavioural and theoretical toolkit with which to measure and interpret the neural mechanisms linking replay and reinforcement learning.

Indexed as

HippocampusRewardVentral StriatumAnimalsBehavior, AnimalLearningMaleMaze LearningNeuronsRatsReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID41285763
PMCPMC12644820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.