ArticleNature communications2025
Solving the where problem and quantifying geometric variation in neuroanatomy using generative diffeomorphic mapping.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.Research square · 2025Article
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A current focus in neuroscience is to map neuronal cell types in whole vertebrate brains using different imaging modalities. Mapping modern molecular and anatomical datasets into a common atlas includes challenges that existing workflows do not adequately address: multimodal signals, missing data or non reference signals, and quantification of individual variation. Our solution implements a generative model describing the likelihood of data given a sequence of transforms of an atlas, and a maximum a posteriori estimation framework. Our approach allows composition of mappings across chains of datasets rather than only pairs, and computes metrics for geometric quantification. We study a range of datasets (in/ex-vivo MRI, STP and fMOST, 2D serial histology, snRNAseq prepared tissue), quantifying cell density and geometric fluctuations across covariates, and reveal that individual variation is often greater than differences due to tissue processing techniques. We provide open source code, dataset standards, and a web interface. This establishes a quantitative workflow for unifying multi-modal whole-brain images in an atlas framework, validated using mouse datasets, enabling large scale integration of datasets essential to modern neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.