Observational studyBMJ open2025
Influence of subnational contextual factors on demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods: a multilevel approach in 46 surveys from low- and middle-income countries.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUnderstanding contextual drivers of family planning is crucial for designing effective, context-specific policies and programmes. This study aimed to assess (1) the extent to which province-level contextual factors are associated with both coverage and wealth-related inequalities in demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods (mDFPS) across provinces in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and (2) whether these factors influence mDFPS at women's level.
designObservational study using multilevel modelling at both ecological and individual levels.
settingWe analysed data from Demographic and Health Surveys between 2011 and 2022 in 46 LMICs.
participantsEcological analysis included 621 provinces. Individual-level analysis included 302 493 women aged 15-49 years, currently married or in union, and in need of contraception (unweighted). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods (mDFPS) and wealth-related inequalities in mDFPS, assessed using the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CIX).
resultsIn both income groups, at the province level, higher mean women's schooling and greater proportion of employed women were positively associated with mDFPS coverage. In contrast, higher male-to-female educational attainment ratios were inversely associated with mDFPS. Provinces with higher means of women's schooling also showed lower wealth-related inequalities in mDFPS. At the individual level, women residing in provinces with higher male-to-female educational attainment ratios were found to have lower odds of mDFPS, regardless of the income group. Additionally, the factors influencing individual women's mDFPS varied depending on the income level of the country's provinces.
conclusionWomen's empowerment and gender equality in education at the province level significantly influence family planning outcomes. Targeted interventions that address each region's specific educational, economic and demographic contexts are crucial for improving coverage and reducing disparities in family planning services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.