Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2025
A cluster randomized controlled trial of an electronic medical record-based pathway for pediatric asthma in primary care in Alberta.
Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02481037 (Primary Care Pathway for Childhood Asthma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Primary Care Pathway for Childhood Asthma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care physicians, who manage the care of most children with asthma, often do not optimally assess disease control, prescribe asthma controller medications, or provide family asthma education. We developed a pediatric asthma clinical pathway embedded in an electronic medical record (EMR) for use by primary care practices, and we sought to evaluate its effects on prescription and use of asthma controller medication for children with asthma.
methodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, enrolling primary care practices in Alberta that used Wolf or Med Access EMRs, and managed at least 50 children with asthma. The multifaceted intervention included an EMR-based pathway for pediatric asthma, Web-based education modules for physicians, and train-the-trainer sessions for practice staff to provide patient education. The control intervention was standard care. We extracted study data from participating practices' EMRs, and standard emergency department and hospital administrative data sets. The primary and main secondary outcomes were improvement in the proportion of children prescribed and dispensed controller medications, respectively.
resultsEleven practices were randomly assigned to each of the intervention and control groups. The intervention did not significantly change the proportion of children prescribed (mean difference 4.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0% to 10.5%) or dispensed (mean difference -0.1%, 95% CI -7.1% to 6.9%) controller medications.
interpretationOur multifaceted intervention did not improve the proportion of children in primary care who were prescribed or dispensed a controller medication for asthma. These results suggest that such interventions may require active alerts and targeting of walk-in and urgent care clinics to have a meaningful impact on clinical practice.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02481037.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.