Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284965›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Analyzing Determinants Affecting the Use of mHealth Apps Among Family Caregivers of Patients With Stroke in Chinese Communities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Yun Du, Jun-Ying Fan, Guang-Zhi Liu, Zi-Yue Yang, Yang Lei, Yu-Fang Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun DuSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, 44 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China, 86 15269163352.ORCID 0009-0005-1962-5523
Jun-Ying FanSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, 44 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China, 86 15269163352.ORCID 0009-0009-3653-418X
Guang-Zhi LiuSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, 44 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China, 86 15269163352.ORCID 0009-0005-2542-8657
Zi-Yue YangSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, 44 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China, 86 15269163352.ORCID 0009-0006-6599-4810
Yang LeiSchool of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-9698
Yu-Fang GuoSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, 44 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China, 86 15269163352.ORCID 0000-0002-9763-4119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps are believed to be an effective method to support family caregivers to better care for patients with stroke. This study's purpose was to explore the status and the influencing factors of mHealth app use among family caregivers of patients with stroke via machine learning (ML) models. Objective: This study aimed to understand the status quo of mHealth app use among community family caregivers of patients with stroke and the factors influencing their use behavior. Six ML models were used to construct the classifier, and the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm was introduced to interpret the best ML model. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, family carers of patients with stroke were recruited. Data on their basic profile and mHealth app use were obtained through face-to-face questionnaires. Hedonic motivation, usage habits, and other relevant information were additionally measured among app users. A total of 12 models were constructed using six ML algorithms. The top-performing logistic regression and random forest models were further analyzed with SHAP to interpret key influencing factors. Results: A total of 360 family caregivers of patients with stroke were included in this study from March 2023 to November 2023, of which 206 (57.2%) reported having used mHealth apps. Of the 6 ML models, the logistic regression model performed the best in terms of whether caregivers used the mHealth app, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.753 (95% CI 0.698-0.802), accuracy of 0.694 (95% CI 0.647-0.742), sensitivity of 0.748 (95% CI 0.688-0.806), and specificity of 0.623 (95% CI 0.547-0.698). SHAP analysis showed that the top 5 most influencing factors were educational level, age, the patient's self-care ability, the relationship with the cared-for individual, and the duration of illness. The random forest model performed best in terms of use behavior with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.773 (95% CI 0.725-0.818), accuracy of 0.602 (95% CI 0.534-0.665), sensitivity of 0.476 (95% CI 0.420-0.533), and specificity of 0.769 (95% CI 0.738-0.797). The SHAP analysis revealed that hedonic motivation, habits, occupation, convenience conditions, and effort expectations were the 5 most significant influencing factors. Conclusions: The research results indicate that the software developers and policymakers of mHealth apps should take the abovementioned influencing factors into consideration when developing and promoting the software. We should focus on the older adults with lower educational levels, lower the threshold for software use, and provide more convenient conditions. By grasping the hedonistic tendencies and habitual usage characteristics of users, they can provide them with more concise and accurate health information, which will enhance the popularity and effectiveness of mHealth apps.

Indexed as

CaregiversMachine LearningMobile ApplicationsStrokeAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinecaregiverscommunityinfluencing factorsmachine learning modelmHealthmobile healthstroke

Identifiers

PMID41284965
PMCPMC12643396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.