ArticleNeurology2025
Disability Worsening Phenotypes in Multiple Sclerosis and Impact of Disease-Modifying Treatments.
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibit variability in disability progression and response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Identifying those at greatest risk of disability worsening and most likely to benefit from high-efficacy DMTs remains challenging. We aimed to identify distinct disability worsening phenotypes, explore their mechanisms, and evaluate DMT impact across them.
methodsIn this multicenter cohort study, we analyzed clinical and MRI data from propensity-matched cohorts of treated and untreated patients with relapse-onset MS from the Italian MS Register. Inclusion criteria were as follows: ≥3 years of follow-up, ≤1 year between disease onset and first assessment, and complete clinical and baseline MRI data. Latent class mixture models were applied to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores from untreated patients to identify disability worsening phenotypes. We compared proportions of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening events across phenotypes. A random forest algorithm, trained (70%) and tested (30%) on baseline clinical and MRI features of untreated patients, was used to assign phenotypes to treated patients. Linear mixed-effects models estimated DMT impact on disability trajectories within each phenotype.
resultsWe analyzed data from 2,563 untreated (mean age 41.2 ± 10 years, 67% female) and 2,952 treated (mean age 40.8 ± 11.4 years, 66% female) patients with MS over a median follow-up of 10.1 (interquartile range: 7.0-13.0) years. Four phenotypes were identified in untreated patients: "minimal-worsening" (15%), "late-worsening" (70%), "early-worsening" (3%), and "rapid-worsening" (12%). In all phenotypes, PIRA represented the main disability accrual mechanism. "Early-worsening" and "rapid-worsening" phenotypes exhibited more brain and spinal cord T2-hyperintense and gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline. The classification algorithm assigned phenotypes to patients receiving DMTs with 71% accuracy: "minimal-worsening" (18%), "late-worsening" (61%), "early-worsening" (13%), and "rapid-worsening" (8%). DMT exposure significantly reduced disability accrual in all phenotypes, with high-efficacy DMTs (β = -0.16, standard error (SE) = 0.06, DISCUSSION: We identified 4 clinically relevant disability worsening phenotypes in relapse-onset MS, primarily driven by PIRA, with greater CNS involvement linked to early and rapid progression. Despite reliance on EDSS alone, these phenotypes may inform personalized treatment and response assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.