Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284896›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A 120-y time series of genomes reveals the consequences of closed breeding in German Shepherd Dogs.

Lachie Scarsbrook, Gabriella J Spatola, Dayna L Dreger, Tatiana R Feuerborn, Reuben M Buckley, Alberto Carmagnini, Anne-Claire Fabre, Alexander C Harris, Stefan T Hertwig, Tosso Leeb and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Blood biomarkers and breed genetics of aging in pet dogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Genomic ancestry, behavior, and the domestication of the dog.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lachie Scarsbrook *Palaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-4455
Gabriella J Spatola *Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-7889-3425
Dayna L DregerCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-6431
Tatiana R FeuerbornCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-1610-3402
Reuben M BuckleyCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-6334-3906
Alberto CarmagniniPalaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-4269
Anne-Claire FabreNaturhistorisches Museum Bern, Bern 3005, Switzerland.
Alexander C HarrisCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-5363
Stefan T HertwigInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Tosso LeebVetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3001, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-4880
Timothy A MousseauDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-4868
Kristina TabbadaPalaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-8291
Olaf ThalmannPalaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-0130
Greger Larson *Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-0392
Laurent A F Frantz *Palaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-3885
Elaine A Ostrander *Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-9738

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 524207393EC | European Research Council (ERC) ERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEADEC | European Research Council (ERC) ERC-2019-StG-853272-PALAEOFARMHHS | NIH | NIDA | Intramural Research Program (IRP) HG200377UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/K003259/1UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/K005243/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many contemporary breed dogs display reduced genomic health compared to mixed-breed dogs, including reduced heterozygosity and increased genetic load, likely due to strong directed breeding. Lack of historical genomes, however, has made it difficult to disentangle the timing and drivers of these declines given complex and breed-specific demographic histories, artificial selection, and crossbreeding. Here, we sequenced genomes of nine 20th-century museum specimens (1906-1993) of pedigree German Shepherd Dogs (GSDs) to directly assess the consequences of contemporary breeding practices on genomic diversity and health over time. The GSD breed offers an excellent case study, given the breed's fluctuations in global popularity, differing selective regimes, and the GSD's use in the establishment of other breeds, including wolfdogs. Genome-wide heterozygosity showed significant reductions after the Second World War (WWII), coincident with an increase in both the frequency of runs of homozygosity and load. We also detected repeated population bottlenecks linked to the use of popular sires throughout the 20th century. Finally, although hybridization with wolves has led to genome-wide increases in heterozygosity in wolfdog breeds derived from the GSD, nonadmixed ancestry blocks (dog or wolf) were severely depleted in diversity due to the limited number of founders involved in their establishment. Combined, our results indicate that declines in the genomic health of GSDs and related breeds occurred not at the onset of breed formation but throughout the last century, as a result of population bottlenecks associated with WWII and the repeated use of popular sires.

Indexed as

BreedingGenomeAnimalsDogsFemaleGenetic VariationHeterozygoteMalePedigreeWolvesbreedcaninehybridizationinbreedingselection

Identifiers

PMID41284896
PMCPMC12684887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.