Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Lachie ScarsbrookThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-4455
Kylie M CairnsEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-2854
Kieren J MitchellAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-0262
Katia BougiouriSection for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1352, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-2755
Allowen EvinInstitute of Evolutionary Science-Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier 34095, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-1649
Alexander C HarrisCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-5363
Anna E WoodThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-5650-537X
Zehui ZhangThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.
Daniel J LawsonDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5311-6213
Joel M AlvesThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-9134
Peter W DitchfieldResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-6591
Sofia Granja-MartinsThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.
Amy K StyringResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-1301
Kristina TabbadaThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-8291
Olaf ThalmannPalaeogenomics Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-0130
Mathew S CrowtherSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-1161
Michael CurryArchaeology & Paleoanthropology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Tatiana R FeuerbornCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-1610-3402
Loukas G KoungoulosArchaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-0142
Mike LetnicEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Elizabeth H ReedEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-1861
Richard SabinVertebrates Division, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-7596
Heidi G ParkerCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-9707-6380
Elaine A OstranderCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-9738
Laurent A F FrantzPalaeogenomics Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich 80539, Germany.
Greger LarsonThe Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-0392
Melanie A FilliosArchaeology & Paleoanthropology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-0061
Funding
Australia and Pacific Science Foundation (APSF) APSF 20080Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 524207393EC | ERC | HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) ERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEADEC | ERC | HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) ERC-2019-StG-853272-PALAEOFARMUKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/K003259/1UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/K005243/1
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The European colonial expansion had dramatic consequences on both Indigenous Peoples and local fauna. In Australia, the degree to which the arrival of Europeans and their dogs impacted the ecology and ancestry of dingoes is contentious. To test for gene flow with European dogs, we sequenced genomes of 18 ancient Australian dingoes from the Nullarbor Plain, two early 20th-century New Guinean dingoes, a mid-19th-century kangaroo hound, and 33 contemporary dingoes from across Australia. To quantify dietary shifts after the arrival of the First Fleet (AD1788), we generated stable isotopic (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The impacts of European arrival on Australian dingoes. · full record | OpenQuestion