ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Stochastic responses and marginal valuation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of policy impacts in a dynamic and uncertain reality is vital to supporting informed economic policy design and implementation. Dynamic, stochastic economic models used in policy evaluation necessarily simplify the world as we know it. This motivates us to explore, refine, and extend tools aimed at producing marginal valuations that shed light on why some policies are optimal and how others, though suboptimal, can be improved. We present representations of these marginal valuations that embrace uncertainty and support robust implementation-even in environments characterized by "deep uncertainties." These representations offer a more complete understanding of how interactions among multiple state variables, concerns about model misspecification, and uncertainties surrounding potentially long-term implications contribute to the cogent assessment of policies. We argue that these methods are particularly salient for evaluating the global cost of climate change and the global value of research and development with long-term prospects for success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.