Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284864›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs and its consequences for dog evolution.

Clément Car, Roya Adavoudi, Andreas Berghänel, Melissa Vanderheyden, Andre E Moura, Friederike Range, Giulia Cimarelli, Martina Lazzaroni, Rachel Dale, Ikhlass El Berbri and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic ancestry, behavior, and the domestication of the dog.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Clément CarDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-2950
Roya AdavoudiDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6125-881X
Andreas BerghänelDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-3392
Melissa VanderheydenDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0009-0007-0733-4141
Andre E MouraDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-0196
Friederike RangeDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3127-5536
Giulia CimarelliDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6031-0364
Martina LazzaroniDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7030-8703
Rachel DaleDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems 3500, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-8834
Ikhlass El BerbriDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Agronomy and Veterinary Institute Hassan II, Rabat 10101, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-0121-6861
Gabriella J SpatolaCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-7889-3425
Timothy A MousseauDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-4868
Sarah Marshall-PesciniDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1160, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5944-4701
Małgorzata PilotDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6057-5768

Funding

Austrian Academy of Sciences DOC fellowshipAustrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/I5052Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P-34749Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P-35753Clean Futures Fund no reference numberHHS | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) HG200377Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej (NAWA) PPN/BAT/2021/00013/00001Narodowe Centrum Nauki (NCN) 2020/02/Y/NZ8/00001OeAD-GmbH (OEAD) KFO2702201Samuel Freeman Charitable Trust no reference number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polygamous mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs (FRDs) contrasts with the social monogamy typical of gray wolves and all other wild canids. The transition to polygamy in dogs could have been initiated by a shift from apex predator to human commensal during the early domestication stages. Here, we test this hypothesis by investigating the characteristics of the FRD mating system that could have been important for domestication. This inference is based on genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) data from three geographically distinct populations, including behavioral data for one of them. The reconstructed genealogies form a wide network of kinship relationships resulting from the frequent occurrence of maternal and paternal half-siblings, reflecting male and female polygamy. Reproductive success is positively correlated with the strength of social interactions and the number of connections with opposite-sex individuals, implying a preference toward familiar mates and the importance of social relationships in determining mating patterns. This is supported by a nonrandom distribution of reproductive partners and a reproductive skew in males and females. Multiple paternity within litters points to female polygamy within a single estrus, and sexual size dimorphism implies sexual selection favoring larger males. Physiological changes resulting from polygamy, including increased male fertility and reduced breeding seasonality, could have facilitated the natural spread of novel adaptive traits and limited the introgression from wolves. The change in reproductive patterns, typically considered a consequence of selective breeding, could instead have occurred naturally in response to the dietary niche change, triggering further changes that facilitated the domestication process.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDogsDomesticationFemaleMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproductiondomesticationgenealogymating systemreproductive successsocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID41284864
PMCPMC12684915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.