Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284702›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

The SnaFab versus the Razi antivenom for treatment of snakebite envenomation: A randomized, double-blind (investigator and victims), active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Seyed Reza Mousavi, Alihasan Rahmani, Maryam Amini Pouya, Elnaz Zabihi Eidgahi, Mohamad Delirrad, Hamed Hosseini, Alireza Ghassemi Toussi, Behnaz Hedayatjoo, Seyyedeh Maryam Afshani, Mohammad Amin Ghobadi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Seyed Reza MousaviMedical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-5928
Alihasan RahmaniDepartment of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Maryam Amini PouyaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elnaz Zabihi EidgahiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohamad DelirradDepartment of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia, Iran.
Hamed HosseiniMedical Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Ghassemi ToussiMedical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Behnaz HedayatjooScience and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Seyyedeh Maryam AfshaniFaculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin GhobadiFaculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza ShahidiFaculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Amirhossein MousaviMedical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam BarghbaniUniversity of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto School of Medicine (FMRP), Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Mahdi Jannati Yazdan AbadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-2963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenomation is a significant public health issue in Iran, and it is crucial to have effective and easily accessible antivenom treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the SnaFab and the Razi antivenoms for treating snakebite envenomation. The study was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial involving 98 snakebite victims. The patients received either the SnaFab or the Razi antivenoms, with the primary endpoint being the recovery rate within 48 hours after antivenom infusion. The secondary endpoints included adverse events over a 14-day monitoring period and total antivenom consumption. The non-inferiority margin (NIM) was set at 20 percent. The study was commenced on April 17th, 2020, and concluded on May 15th, 2021. The recovery rate was 100 percent in the SnaFab group, which was non-inferior to the Razi antivenom group (98%). The mean number of antivenom units administered was 8.95 ± 4.40 units in the SnaFab group, compared to 9.04 ± 4.49 units in the Razi group (P value: 0.92). Adverse events were reported by 10.2% of individuals in the SnaFab group and 20.4% in the Razi group (p value = 0.27). Muscle weakness was the most commonly reported adverse event in the Razi group (8%), while vertigo was most frequent in the SnaFab group (4%). Moreover, there were no reports of anaphylactic shock or serum sickness. In summary, this study found that SnaFab antivenom is non-inferior to Razi antivenom for treating snakebite envenomation in Iran. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed.

Identifiers

PMID41284702
PMCPMC12643280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.