Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Harry Potter and personality assessment: The utility of the Sorting Hat Quiz in personality traits' assessment.

Lidia Baran, Maria Flakus, Franciszek Stefanek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lidia BaranInstitute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Maria FlakusInstitute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6667-8020
Franciszek StefanekInstitute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions with fiction influence our behavior and identification, as fiction encompasses elements of day-to-day reality. For instance, Harry Potter (HP) readers often identify with one of the Hogwarts Houses, recognizing their personality traits as similar to one of the house's members. This tendency constitutes a fertile ground for the popularity of the Sorting Hat Quiz (SHQ), i.e., a quiz allowing a placement to one of the houses. Recent studies showed that SHQ predicts some personality traits, i.e., Big Five, Dark Triad, and need for cognition. However, those studies were focused only on HP fans. Thus, the presented study aimed to replicate and extend previous studies by (1) using more complex measurements of personality traits and (2) analyzing the obtained results in groups of HP readers and non-readers. Our findings suggested that although participants sorted (or desired to be sorted) into a particular house shared some of the hypothesized personality features, the predictive power of the SHQ was limited only to HP readers, with minor or non-existent effects in the non-reader subsample. We discuss the obtained result in light of the narrative collective assimilation hypothesis and offer directions for future studies focused on the culture-based phenomenon.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality AssessmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41284663
PMCPMC12643298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.