Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284655›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Understanding the acceptability of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests: A multi-country qualitative study.

Wezzie S Lora, Yasmin Dunkley, Itai Kabonga, Elvis Isere, MackWellings Phiri, Chimwemwe Kwanjo Banda, Euphemia Sibanda, John Bimba, Richard Chilongosi, Karin Hatzold and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wezzie S LoraMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Yasmin DunkleyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-0577
Itai KabongaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Elvis IsereZankli Research Centre, Bingham University, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-2218
MackWellings PhiriKamuzu College of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2227-4359
Chimwemwe Kwanjo BandaMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Euphemia SibandaLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-1076
John BimbaZankli Research Centre, Bingham University, Abuja, Nigeria.
Richard ChilongosiFamily Health Services, Blantyre, Malawi.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Cape Town, South Africa.
Frances M CowanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-4422
Elizabeth L CorbettLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Augustine T ChokoMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Nicola DesmondLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-8569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessible and timely diagnostic testing was essential during the COVID-19 pandemic to control the virus's spread and mitigate severe outcomes. However, real-time polymerase chain reaction tests, although sensitive incur high costs and prolonged turnaround times, and face implementation challenges in many resource-constrained settings. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT), which can be administered either by providers or as self-tests, are accessible and low-cost alternatives. We conducted this study to assess the acceptability of Ag-RDT in different use cases and delivery models in Malawi, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe. We implemented a qualitative study drawing on Louart's theoretical framework for the acceptability of technological healthcare innovations. In-depth interviews (n = 228) were conducted with community members, healthcare workers and providers to explore participants' experiences with Ag-RDT COVID-19 testing. Data were analysed using NVivo 14 software, applying an inductive thematic approach centred on the constant comparison method across countries, participant groups, and delivery models. The study revealed that Ag-RDT COVID-19 testing was acceptable across the three settings due to speed, non-invasiveness, and simplicity in sample collection compared to the real-time polymerase chain reaction alternative. Ag-RDT was integrated into existing healthcare systems with minimal disruption and used effectively across different use cases and populations. Participants particularly valued the self-testing option for its privacy, reduced stigma and convenience. However, acceptability was somewhat affected by the timing of the intervention, as it was implemented toward the end of the COVID-19 pandemic when many individuals no longer perceived testing as a priority. COVID-19 Ag-RDT testing was an acceptable complementary methodology to PCR testing in Malawi, Nigeria and Zimbabwe. The findings emphasise the need for strategic investment in accessible diagnostic technologies that complement existing molecular diagnostics, particularly supporting decentralised testing and rapid response capabilities in resource-constrained settings while maintaining robust surveillance systems.

Identifiers

PMID41284655
PMCPMC12643265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.