Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284493›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

At-Home Auditory Assessment Using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) to Understand Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.

E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, Tess K Koerner, William J Bologna, Sara Momtaz, Katherine N Menon, Audrey Carrillo, Eric C Hoover, G Christopher Stecker, Frederick J Gallun, Aaron R Seitz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-ManceraDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Cognitive and Brain Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8626-5621
Tess K KoernerOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
William J BolognaDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-6892
Sara MomtazCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-3141
Katherine N MenonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, Columbia, MD, USA.
Audrey CarrilloDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Cognitive and Brain Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric C HooverDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, Columbia, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-9925
G Christopher SteckerCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-9839
Frederick J GallunOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4145-2199
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Cognitive and Brain Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Enhanced environments for psychophysical evaluation and trainingR01DC018166 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLUN, FREDERICK J., SEITZ, AARON R · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Efficient diagnostic tools to evaluate central auditory dysfunctionR01DC015051 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., GALLUN, FREDERICK J. · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015051NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that remote testing of suprathreshold auditory function using distributed technologies can produce results that closely match those obtained in laboratory settings with specialized, calibrated equipment. This work has facilitated the validation of various behavioral measures in remote settings that provide valuable insights into auditory function. In the current study, we sought to address whether a broad battery of auditory assessments could explain variance in self-report of hearing handicap. To address this, we used a portable psychophysics assessment tool along with an online recruitment tool (Prolific) to collect auditory task data from participants with (

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionHearingHearing LossHearing TestsPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSelf ReportAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAuditory ThresholdCase-Control StudiesCognitionFemaleHumansMaleagingauditory assessmentcentral auditory processingdigital healthpreventiontelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41284493
PMCPMC12644446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.