Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284475›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Bisphosphonate-related ocular adverse events: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.

Yue Cui, Zhihui Song, Xinglong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to identify and characterize signals of ocular adverse events (AEs) related to bisphosphonates (BPs) using FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data (Q1 2004 to Q3 2024) to inform future safety investigations. Disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods to identify BP-related ocular AE signals. In addition, a modified ROR method was utilized to examine differences across gender and age. Among 6,965 ocular AE reports for five BPs (alendronate, zoledronate, pamidronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), 136 positive signals were identified, predominantly unlisted in drug labels. Notable risks included ocular inflammatory AEs (especially zoledronate) and novel risk signals such as cataract, glaucoma, and macular degeneration. Standardized MedDRA queries (SMQ) linked BPs to 11 eye disorders, with scleral disorders common to all five BPs and pamidronate involving the broadest SMQ categories. Ocular AEs for alendronate, zoledronate, and pamidronate exhibited age-related differences, while those for alendronate and zoledronate showed gender differences. This study identifies high-risk and novel ocular AEs related to BPs. These findings warrant further validation in future studies.

Indexed as

bisphosphonatesdisproportionality analysisFAERSocular adverse events

Identifiers

PMID41284475
PMCPMC12700134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.