Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284474›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Solvent-Site Prediction for Fragment Docking and Its Implication on Fragment-Based Drug Discovery.

Laura Almena Rodriguez, Vera A Spanke, Christian Kersten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Evaluation of Explicit Solvent Models for RNA-Ligand Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura Almena RodriguezInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Staudingerweg 5, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-8602-9603
Vera A SpankeInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Staudingerweg 5, Mainz 55128, Germany.
Christian KerstenInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Staudingerweg 5, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9976-7639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy in the posing and scoring of low-affinity fragments is still a main challenge in fragment-based virtual screenings. The positive impact of including structural or predicted water molecules during docking on the docking performance is discussed frequently and is not conclusive so far. We present a comprehensive statistical evaluation of the effect of including crystallographic or predicted water molecules on the docking performance of fragment redocking. Further, cross-docking fragments into binding sites occupied by larger ligands and

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsSolventsBinding SitesLigandsWaterLigandsProteinsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID41284474
PMCPMC12690578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.