Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284362›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2025

Exploration of questionable backbone conformations in crystallographic structure models using a structural alphabet.

Clémence Sarrau, Marine Baillif, Lucas Mantel, Dounia Benyakhlaf, Shamima Peerbux, Leslie Regad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clémence SarrauUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.ORCID 0009-0001-9800-9024
Marine BaillifUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.ORCID 0009-0003-9305-5886
Lucas MantelUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.ORCID 0009-0005-1289-4632
Dounia BenyakhlafUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.
Shamima PeerbuxUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.
Leslie RegadUniversité Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative (BFA) CNRS UMR 8251 - In Silico Pharmacological Profiling (IsPP) INSERM U1133, F-75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-5283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 80% of protein structure models in the Protein Data Bank have been solved using X-ray crystallography. Despite continuous improvements in this experimental technique, crystallographic structure models may still present artifacts related to the crystallization process as well as errors introduced during model building and refinement, even in high-resolution cases. Such limitations can alter atomic or residue positions, leading to local misconformations, local or domain rearrangements, and occasionally global distortions. In this study, we developed a protocol to locate residues with questionable conformations, where conformations may be uncertain, atypical or influenced by crystallographic modeling and refinement. To do so, we started from a set of 826 nonredundant X-ray protein structure models. Each X-ray model underwent an energy-minimization step that relaxes atomic geometry by reducing potential energy. Residues that exhibited different local conformations between the X-ray and minimized models were therefore considered as having questionable conformations. To identify them, we compared the X-ray and minimized models of each protein using the HMM-SA structural alphabet. Our results revealed that over 18% of the residues in the protein set have questionable conformations in their backbone. These conformations can occur either as isolated events within the protein sequence or can form patterns. Moreover, we observed that the frequency of questionable conformations per X-ray model was independent of factors such as the date of deposition, resolution or crystal system. Analysis of the properties of residues associated with questionable conformations revealed that they do not specifically occur in flexible or accessible regions. However, there is a correlation between questionable conformations and secondary structures, with a particular overrepresentation of residues with questionable conformations in α-helices. We then further investigated questionable conformations in the structure model of ligand-free HIV-2 protease (PR2). By combining our questionable conformation-detection protocol with molecular-dynamics simulation, we demonstrated that approximately half of the questionable conformations in PDB entry 1hsi correspond to local conformations that are sparsely sampled by PR2 during the molecular-dynamics simulation or are structural outliers detected by the wwPDB report. In addition, our results suggested that these questionable conformations may affect the position of the flaps, two β-sheets forming the top of the binding site. In PDB entry 1hsi, their relative arrangement appears atypical compared with MD simulations, raising questions about the biological relevance of this conformation. To conclude, we have developed a protocol to quantify and localize questionable backbone conformations in X-ray structure models, which can affect the interpretation of structural data.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProteinsCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProteinscrystallographic structuresquestionable conformationsstructural alphabetstructural deformation

Identifiers

PMID41284362
PMCPMC12809442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.