Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284295›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Physiologic Transition During Delayed Cord Clamping With Assisted Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Secondary Analysis of the VentFirst Trial.

Jennifer L Fang, Karen D Fairchild, Gina R Petroni, Marya L Strand, Jamie B Warren, Brenda H Law, Terri E Gorman, Tina A Leone, Sumesh P Thomas, Susan Niermeyer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02742454 (VentFirst), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02742454 naunknown statusnot on this map

VentFirst: A Multicenter RCT of Assisted Ventilation During Delayed Cord Clamping for Extremely Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2016 to 2023Enrolled570ConditionsIntraventricular HemorrhageArmsStandard 30-60 Seconds Cord Clamping, VentFirst 120 Seconds Cord Clamping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer L FangDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Karen D FairchildDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Gina R PetroniDivision of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Marya L StrandDepartment of Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Jamie B WarrenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Brenda H LawDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Terri E GormanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tina A LeoneDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Sumesh P ThomasSection of Newborn Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Susan NiermeyerSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora.
VentFirst Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Assisted ventilation during delayed cord clamping (DCC) may improve the physiologic transition of extremely preterm infants immediately after birth. Objective: To determine whether assisted ventilation during 120 seconds of DCC was associated with reduced higher-level resuscitative interventions (intubation, chest compressions, or epinephrine administration) compared with DCC for 30 to 60 seconds followed by resuscitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a secondary analysis of the VentFirst randomized clinical trial that was conducted from September 2, 2016, through February 21, 2023, at 12 centers in the US and Canada. Infants born at 23 weeks 0 days' to 28 weeks 6 days' gestational age (GA) were included. Intervention: Infants randomized to the intervention received either positive-pressure ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure from 30 to 120 seconds after birth, followed by umbilical cord clamping. Those randomized to control received 30 to 60 seconds of DCC followed by assisted ventilation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the odds of higher-level resuscitative interventions in the delivery room (DR). Intention-to-treat analyses within 2 a priori cohorts (infants breathing well and not breathing well 30 seconds after birth) used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of intervention vs control. Results: All 570 infants enrolled in the trial were included. Infants had a median (IQR) GA of 26.6 (25.2-27.9) weeks and 273 (47.9%) were female. A total of 271 infants (47.5%) were assessed as not breathing well 30 seconds after birth (150 intervention and 121 control), and 299 (52.5%) were assessed as breathing well 30 seconds after birth (128 intervention and 171 control). In the not-breathing-well cohort, 146 infants (53.9%) were intubated in the DR, 4 received chest compressions (2 intervention and 2 control), and 1 received epinephrine (control). Intubation was less frequent in the intervention group (71 infants [47.3%] vs 75 infants [62.0%]; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.89). When adjusted by GA strata at randomization, infants in the 26 to 28 weeks' GA stratum who were in the intervention group were less likely to be intubated in the DR (18 of 79 infants [22.8%] vs 29 of 60 infants [48.3%]; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.65). However, there was no difference in intubation rates for infants in the 23 to 25 weeks' GA stratum (53 of 71 infants [74.7%] vs 46 of 61 infants [75.4%]; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.44-2.12). Among infants breathing well at 30 seconds, 74 (24.7%) were intubated in the DR, and none received compressions or epinephrine. Intubation rates were similar between intervention and control in the breathing-well cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: While the VentFirst trial did not find a difference in death or intraventricular hemorrhage, this secondary analysis found that assisted ventilation during DCC was associated with less intubation in the DR, primarily among infants born at 26 to 28 weeks' gestation who were not breathing well 30 seconds after birth. Additional studies are needed before implementing assisted ventilation during DCC in clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02742454.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematurePositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialResuscitationUmbilical Cord ClampingCanadaContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSecondary Data AnalysisTime FactorsUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID41284295
PMCPMC12645335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.