ReviewInsights into imaging2025
Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: principles, challenges, and opportunities.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-Stop Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Breast Biopsy: A Practical Workflow from a Tertiary Referral Center.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- How to optimise breast cancer staging with contrast-enhanced mammography: current evidence and clinical implications.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided wire implantation: a cost-effective and reliable alternative for non-palpable contrast-enhanced imaging-only lesions.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided fan biopsy of the breast: clinical utility and outcomes from a single-center experience.BJR open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy enables the tissue sampling of enhancing breast lesions that are not visible on conventional imaging. The technique combines dual-energy stereotactic acquisition with intravenous contrast administration, allowing accurate targeting of recombined-only lesions. It represents a practical alternative to MRI-guided biopsy, particularly in settings where MRI access is limited or contraindicated. This review examines current evidence, procedural experience, and challenges associated with CEM guidance. Early studies support its technical feasibility, although data remain scarce and heterogeneous regarding lesion selection, procedural experience, and outcome definitions. Broader implementation is challenged by equipment specifications, contrast administration practices, logistics, and reimbursement issues. As clinical adoption increases, structured patient triage pathways, standardised protocols, and prospective validation are essential. CEM-guided biopsy is a promising technique in breast imaging and has the potential to reduce reliance on MRI guidance. However, further research is required to define its role and ensure consistent performance across clinical settings. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review critically examines current evidence, technical feasibility, and implementation challenges of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy. It highlights potential advantages for clinical settings where MRI guidance is limited, while addressing existing limitations and areas that require further research. KEY POINTS: Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy is a dual-energy stereotactic procedure that enables the targeting of enhancing lesions that lack conventional imaging correlates. The modality is accurate and feasible, though its implementation is challenged by technical heterogeneity and the absence of standardised protocols. Broader clinical adoption requires structured diagnostic workflows, validated contrast administration strategies, and prospective multicentre evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.