Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284217›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2025

Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: principles, challenges, and opportunities.

Rodrigo Alcantara, Javier Azcona, Mireia Pitarch, Elisenda Vall, Elisabet Vila-Trias, E Natalia Arenas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rodrigo AlcantaraDepartament de Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain. ralcantara@hmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-5640
Javier AzconaRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia PitarchRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisenda VallRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet Vila-TriasRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
E Natalia ArenasRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy enables the tissue sampling of enhancing breast lesions that are not visible on conventional imaging. The technique combines dual-energy stereotactic acquisition with intravenous contrast administration, allowing accurate targeting of recombined-only lesions. It represents a practical alternative to MRI-guided biopsy, particularly in settings where MRI access is limited or contraindicated. This review examines current evidence, procedural experience, and challenges associated with CEM guidance. Early studies support its technical feasibility, although data remain scarce and heterogeneous regarding lesion selection, procedural experience, and outcome definitions. Broader implementation is challenged by equipment specifications, contrast administration practices, logistics, and reimbursement issues. As clinical adoption increases, structured patient triage pathways, standardised protocols, and prospective validation are essential. CEM-guided biopsy is a promising technique in breast imaging and has the potential to reduce reliance on MRI guidance. However, further research is required to define its role and ensure consistent performance across clinical settings. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review critically examines current evidence, technical feasibility, and implementation challenges of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy. It highlights potential advantages for clinical settings where MRI guidance is limited, while addressing existing limitations and areas that require further research. KEY POINTS: Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy is a dual-energy stereotactic procedure that enables the targeting of enhancing lesions that lack conventional imaging correlates. The modality is accurate and feasible, though its implementation is challenged by technical heterogeneity and the absence of standardised protocols. Broader clinical adoption requires structured diagnostic workflows, validated contrast administration strategies, and prospective multicentre evaluation.

Indexed as

BiopsyBreast neoplasmsContrast mediaFeasibility studiesMammography

Identifiers

PMID41284217
PMCPMC12644378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.