Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284211›Full record

SynthesisTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review.

Bohua Chen, Lucia Chantal Schneider, Christian Röver, Emmanuelle Comets, Markus Christian Elze, Andrew Hooker, Joanna IntHout, Anne-Sophie Jannot, Daria Julkowska, Yanis Mimouni and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bohua ChenDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany. bohua.chen@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Lucia Chantal SchneiderDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Christian RöverDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Emmanuelle CometsUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, IAME, F-75018, Paris, France.
Markus Christian ElzeData Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrew HookerDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joanna IntHoutDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne-Sophie JannotFrench National Rare Disease Registry (BNDMR), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Daria JulkowskaInstitut Thématique Génétique, Génomique et Bioinformatique, INSERM, 75013, Paris, France.
Yanis MimouniThematic Institute of Genetics, Genomics & Bioinformatics, INSERM, 75013, Paris, France.
Marina SavelievaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nigel StallardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK.
Moreno UrsinoInserm, Université Paris Cité, Inria, HeKA, F-75015, Paris, France.
Marc VandemeulebroeckeDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sebastian WeberNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin PoschCenter for Medical Data Science, Institute of Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah ZoharInserm, Université Paris Cité, Inria, HeKA, F-75015, Paris, France.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of clinical research, computational models have received increasing attention over the past decades. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide an overview of the role of so-called in silico clinical trials (ISCTs) in medical applications. Exemplary for the broad field of clinical medicine, we focused on in silico (IS) methods applied in drug development, sometimes also referred to as model informed drug development (MIDD). We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for published articles and registered clinical trials related to ISCTs. We identified 202 articles and 48 trials, and of these, 76 articles and 19 trials were directly linked to drug development. We extracted information from all 202 articles and 48 clinical trials and conducted a more detailed review of the methods used in the 76 articles that are connected to drug development. Regarding application, most articles and trials focused on cancer and imaging-related research while rare and pediatric diseases were only addressed in 14 articles and 5 trials, respectively. While some models were informed combining mechanistic knowledge with clinical or preclinical (in-vivo or in-vitro) data, the majority of models were fully data-driven, illustrating that clinical data is a crucial part in the process of generating synthetic data in ISCTs. Regarding reproducibility, a more detailed analysis revealed that only 24% (18 out of 76) of the articles provided an open-source implementation of the applied models, and in only 20% of the articles the generated synthetic data were publicly available. Despite the widely raised interest, we also found that it is still uncommon for ISCTs to be part of a registered clinical trial and their application is restricted to specific diseases leaving potential benefits of ISCTs not fully exploited.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationDrug DevelopmentHumansClinical trialIn silicoModel-informed drug developmentPediatric diseaseRare diseaseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41284211
PMCPMC12945960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.