Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284205›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Lymph Node Invasion Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Machine-Learning Study.

Osman Can, Özgün Yücel, Yiğit Can Filtekin, Ahmet Eren Sağır, Çağrı Şevik, Kahraman Aksoy, Alper Ötünçtemur, Halil Lutfi Canat

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osman CanUrology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye. dr.osmancan01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1329-6034
Özgün YücelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-2628
Yiğit Can FiltekinUrology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-5598
Ahmet Eren SağırUrology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1231-5330
Çağrı ŞevikUrology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-704X
Kahraman AksoyUrology Department, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0425-5096
Alper ÖtünçtemurUrology Department, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-3012
Halil Lutfi CanatUrology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-7907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate preoperative prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer is critical for guiding lymph node dissection. Current nomograms often fail to optimall balance the risks of missing metastatic cases and unnecessary dissections. Machine-learning models can provide improved predictive performance through more flexible modeling of complex clinical data.

methodsThe authors developed machine-learning models using clinicopathologic features to predict LNI. Due to a significant class imbalance between LNI-positive and LNI-negative cases, a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was applied to balance the dataset. Four machine-learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost]) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was performed for interpretability.

resultsThe Random Forest model demonstrated the highest predictive performance. Key predictive features included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, clinical stage, and presence of the cribriform pattern. Use of SHAP analysis enabled visualization of individual feature contributions. Compared with existing nomograms, Random Forest and XGBoost achieved superior discrimination performance.

conclusionMachine-learning models may outperform traditional nomograms in predicting LNI in prostate cancer, especially when trained on balanced datasets and combined with explainability tools such as SHAP. Further external validation and inclusion of additional features can improve model generalizability.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesMachine LearningNomogramsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAlgorithmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenROC CurveProstate-Specific AntigenBrigantiMachine learningMSKCCPartinProstate cancerRandom Forest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.