ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2025
Venous congestion from a vascular waterfall perspective: reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor phenomenon.
Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated haemodynamic monitoring of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance in critical care: from physiology to bedside applications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- A Guyton-based hypothesis for venous congestion.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Rethinking Congestion in Heart Failure from Volume Overload to Venous Pressure and Organ Disfunction with VExUS.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Current and future strategies aiming at reducing catecholamine exposure in septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- VExUS versus CVP for assessing venous congestion: oasis or mirage?Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Venous waterfalls mainly buffer backward pressure transmission.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Venous waterfall and venous congestion.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Arteriolar Collapse and Haemodynamic Incoherence in Shock: Rethinking Critical Closing Pressure.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Renal congestion syndrome in critically ill patients: a neglected mechanism of acute kidney injury - A narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Capillary refill time changes are associated with Vascular Waterfall response in post-cardiac surgery patients.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vascular waterfall phenomenon, rooted in Starling resistor principles, describes how blood flow becomes independent of downstream pressure when intraluminal pressure falls below a critical closing pressure (Pcrit). This review first introduces the classic arterial vascular waterfall, where local Pcrit enables organ-specific autoregulation of blood flow despite varying metabolic demands. Building on this framework, we extend the concept to the venous side, where similar mechanisms govern venous return and protect against congestion. The pulmonary vascular waterfall serves as a prototype, illustrating how alveolar pressures redefine downstream limits, shaping the effects of mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In valveless venous beds such as the hepatic veins, a reverse vascular waterfall may occur when elevated downstream pressure, typically right atrial pressure, causes brief, localized backflow buffered by vessel collapse and the emergence of a new Pcrit. These mechanisms explain organ-specific vulnerabilities to venous congestion: organs with effective venous waterfalls, such as the liver and intestine, can partially buffer overload, whereas the kidney, lacking such protection, is highly susceptible to venous pressure-dependent injury. Clinical implications include refined approaches to PEEP titration, fluid management balancing responsiveness with tolerance, and congestion assessment through Doppler ultrasound. Reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor process explains why similar CVP elevations produce heterogeneous organ effects and provides a mechanistic basis for individualized, physiology-guided critical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.