Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284176›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2025

Venous congestion from a vascular waterfall perspective: reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor phenomenon.

Ricardo Castro, Eduardo Kattan, Jaime Retamal, Glenn Hernández, Michael R Pinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Venous waterfalls mainly buffer backward pressure transmission.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026
    Article
  8. Venous waterfall and venous congestion.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo CastroDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay #362 Piso 6, Santiago Centro, 8330049, Santiago, RM, Chile. rcastrol@uc.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9891
Eduardo KattanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay #362 Piso 6, Santiago Centro, 8330049, Santiago, RM, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1997-6893
Jaime RetamalDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay #362 Piso 6, Santiago Centro, 8330049, Santiago, RM, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6817-3659
Glenn HernándezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay #362 Piso 6, Santiago Centro, 8330049, Santiago, RM, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-4087
Michael R PinskyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-700X

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 1250200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vascular waterfall phenomenon, rooted in Starling resistor principles, describes how blood flow becomes independent of downstream pressure when intraluminal pressure falls below a critical closing pressure (Pcrit). This review first introduces the classic arterial vascular waterfall, where local Pcrit enables organ-specific autoregulation of blood flow despite varying metabolic demands. Building on this framework, we extend the concept to the venous side, where similar mechanisms govern venous return and protect against congestion. The pulmonary vascular waterfall serves as a prototype, illustrating how alveolar pressures redefine downstream limits, shaping the effects of mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In valveless venous beds such as the hepatic veins, a reverse vascular waterfall may occur when elevated downstream pressure, typically right atrial pressure, causes brief, localized backflow buffered by vessel collapse and the emergence of a new Pcrit. These mechanisms explain organ-specific vulnerabilities to venous congestion: organs with effective venous waterfalls, such as the liver and intestine, can partially buffer overload, whereas the kidney, lacking such protection, is highly susceptible to venous pressure-dependent injury. Clinical implications include refined approaches to PEEP titration, fluid management balancing responsiveness with tolerance, and congestion assessment through Doppler ultrasound. Reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor process explains why similar CVP elevations produce heterogeneous organ effects and provides a mechanistic basis for individualized, physiology-guided critical care.

Identifiers

PMID41284176
PMCPMC12644348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.