ArticleCurrent diabetes reports2025
Implementation Components of Diabetes Prevention Programs after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review.
Article in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Digital Behavioral Approaches to Improve Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2026Article
- Rethinking the Postpartum "Orphan Window" Treatment in Gestational Diabetes Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo synthesize the components of diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and how they relate to factors that influence implementation. We conducted a scoping review of the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Emcare. We provided a narrative description of intervention components based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the study results based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. RECENT
findingsSeventeen included studies described DPPs after GDM. Recruitment typically began during pregnancy, while interventions started postpartum, with higher reach and participation rates for studies that recruited during pregnancy. The included DPPs used face-to-face delivery, virtual delivery, or a combination. Many programs were individual, but a few had a group component. Program duration varied from one month to three years. The available data highlighted the need to increase engagement, particularly for minority groups, and utilize flexibility and tailoring of program components and delivery to optimize retention, impact and sustainability. Significant barriers to the successful implementation of DPPs after GDM exist; the reporting of intervention components and implementation outcomes in the existing studies is variable. Validated frameworks, including RE-AIM, should be integrated into intervention development, implementation and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41284139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.