ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025
A predictive model for early intubation in patients with COVID-19-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure under awake prone position.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The U-shaped association between serum osmolality and 28-day mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Application value and safety advantages of remimazolam tosilate in sedation for emergency rescue endotracheal intubation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAwake prone positioning (APP) reduces the risk of endotracheal intubation and mortality in COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (ARF) receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). However, a significant proportion of patients undergoing APP are ultimately intubated, and mortality in this subgroup remains high. We aimed to develop a predictive model to be applied within the first 24 h of APP to identify patients at higher risk of progressing to intubation within 72 h of APP initiation.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort including adult patients with COVID-19-related ARF admitted to six intensive care units in Argentina between June 2020 and January 2021. Eligible patients received HFNO and APP for at least 6 h per day. Physiological variables were collected at ICU admission (baseline) and 24 h after APP initiation. Two multivariable logistic regression models were developed using baseline and 24-hour variables, respectively. Predictors were selected based on clinical relevance and univariable associations. A final model was constructed by integrating variables retained from both time points.
resultsOf 400 patients included, 136 (34%) required intubation within the first 72 h. Patients who required intubation were older, had lower PaO₂ and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios, and higher respiratory rates both at baseline and after 24 h. The final predictive model included five variables: age, respiratory rate, PaO₂, FiO₂, and SaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, all measured 24 h after APP initiation. A nomogram was developed based on this model to estimate the individual risk of early intubation.
conclusionIn patients with COVID-19-related ARF treated with HFNO and APP, a model combining baseline characteristics and early physiological response can help predict the need for intubation within 72 h. This tool may support clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and making timely, individualized decisions about escalation of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.